Last night I was surprised to discover that Channel 8 wanted to cover our parent meeting and I was faced with the prospect of deciding whether or not to allow that. Whenever the news media is involved, you have very little control over how the story is reported. A great example of that is last night Channel 8
promo'd the story on the meeting by
talking about our zero tolerance policy and saying some parents were so upset that we we being sued. The meeting wasn't about the zero tolerance policy and to date, we have not been sued by anyone. They also used an image of Faith Academy in their promo, the 2
nd time in as many weeks they have confused the two schools.
While I was greeting parents before the meeting the reporter chose to go outside and caught a couple of our students for their comments. I wish the students would have said something other than what they did, but I'm all for freedom of speech. However, normally when the press is on campus an adult is always present when they are interviewed.
The bottom line is that the story may not have accurately portrayed what the meeting was about: should Faith impose tougher drug testing standards on our students. I think it is a fair characterization to say that almost everyone present was supportive of the summer hair testing program. There may have been some in the audience apposed, but if so, they were very quiet.
One parent did raise an interesting point: is Faith prepared to lose a bunch of students because of the policy change? Honestly, it didn't occur to me that large numbers of families would withdraw students because of this. As a parent, I would want to know if my son or daughter had some drug involvement because the earlier intervention
occurred, the more likely it would have some impact. I hope and pray that is true for all of our families. But if it isn't, I hope we still proceed. If it is a good idea, fear should not defeat it. If it is a bad idea, I hope more people would speak up and defend their point of view.
There are legitimate arguments to make against this proposed change, just as there are legitimate arguments against our zero tolerance policy. School administrators weigh those arguments carefully as policy is crafted. We try to do what is best for all of the students even though individual circumstances may create some perceptions of unfairness. Our aim is to do no harm, but it also to aggressively pursue those measures that can warn and protect students from involvement with drugs and alcohol.